↓ Skip to main content

Dietary Fibre Intake and Risks of Cancers of the Colon and Rectum in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
415 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary Fibre Intake and Risks of Cancers of the Colon and Rectum in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039361
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil Murphy, Teresa Norat, Pietro Ferrari, Mazda Jenab, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Guri Skeie, Christina C. Dahm, Kim Overvad, Anja Olsen, Anne Tjønneland, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Marie Christine Boutron-Ruault, Antoine Racine, Rudolf Kaaks, Birgit Teucher, Heiner Boeing, Manuela M. Bergmann, Antonia Trichopoulou, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Pagona Lagiou, Domenico Palli, Valeria Pala, Salvatore Panico, Rosario Tumino, Paolo Vineis, Peter Siersema, Franzel van Duijnhoven, Petra H. M. Peeters, Anette Hjartaker, Dagrun Engeset, Carlos A. González, Maria-José Sánchez, Miren Dorronsoro, Carmen Navarro, Eva Ardanaz, José R. Quirós, Emily Sonestedt, Ulrika Ericson, Lena Nilsson, Richard Palmqvist, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nick Wareham, Timothy J. Key, Francesca L. Crowe, Veronika Fedirko, Petra A. Wark, Shu-Chun Chuang, Elio Riboli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 395 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 80 19%
Student > Master 52 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Researcher 40 10%
Student > Postgraduate 31 7%
Other 74 18%
Unknown 93 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 8%
Social Sciences 10 2%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 101 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#909,305
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,837
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,583
of 179,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#155
of 3,959 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,959 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.