You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-5-33 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon D French, Steve McDonald, Joanne E McKenzie, Sally E Green |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Librarian | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 32% |