↓ Skip to main content

Towards Universal Health Coverage: An Evaluation of Rwanda Mutuelles in Its First Eight Years

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
450 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards Universal Health Coverage: An Evaluation of Rwanda Mutuelles in Its First Eight Years
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039282
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunling Lu, Brian Chin, Jiwon Lee Lewandowski, Paulin Basinga, Lisa R. Hirschhorn, Kenneth Hill, Megan Murray, Agnes Binagwaho

Abstract

Mutuelles is a community-based health insurance program, established since 1999 by the Government of Rwanda as a key component of the national health strategy on providing universal health care. The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of Mutuelles on achieving universal coverage of medical services and financial risk protection in its first eight years of implementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Rwanda 2 <1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 439 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 115 26%
Researcher 71 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 12%
Student > Postgraduate 31 7%
Other 22 5%
Other 77 17%
Unknown 81 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 32%
Social Sciences 78 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 3%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 97 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#839,844
of 25,398,331 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,069
of 221,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,224
of 177,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#147
of 3,910 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,398,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,910 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.