↓ Skip to main content

Ecological Adaptation of Diverse Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Populations

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecological Adaptation of Diverse Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Populations
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Parker, Andony P. Melathopoulos, Rick White, Stephen F. Pernal, M. Marta Guarna, Leonard J. Foster

Abstract

Honey bees are complex eusocial insects that provide a critical contribution to human agricultural food production. Their natural migration has selected for traits that increase fitness within geographical areas, but in parallel their domestication has selected for traits that enhance productivity and survival under local conditions. Elucidating the biochemical mechanisms of these local adaptive processes is a key goal of evolutionary biology. Proteomics provides tools unique among the major 'omics disciplines for identifying the mechanisms employed by an organism in adapting to environmental challenges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
United States 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
France 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Zambia 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 180 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 18%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 28 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 123 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Environmental Science 8 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 35 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#623,435
of 23,940,484 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,613
of 205,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,661
of 98,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#34
of 728 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 728 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.