↓ Skip to main content

Re-Shuffling of Species with Climate Disruption: A No-Analog Future for California Birds?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Re-Shuffling of Species with Climate Disruption: A No-Analog Future for California Birds?
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006825
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Stralberg, Dennis Jongsomjit, Christine A. Howell, Mark A. Snyder, John D. Alexander, John A. Wiens, Terry L. Root

Abstract

By facilitating independent shifts in species' distributions, climate disruption may result in the rapid development of novel species assemblages that challenge the capacity of species to co-exist and adapt. We used a multivariate approach borrowed from paleoecology to quantify the potential change in California terrestrial breeding bird communities based on current and future species-distribution models for 60 focal species. Projections of future no-analog communities based on two climate models and two species-distribution-model algorithms indicate that by 2070 over half of California could be occupied by novel assemblages of bird species, implying the potential for dramatic community reshuffling and altered patterns of species interactions. The expected percentage of no-analog bird communities was dependent on the community scale examined, but consistent geographic patterns indicated several locations that are particularly likely to host novel bird communities in the future. These no-analog areas did not always coincide with areas of greatest projected species turnover. Efforts to conserve and manage biodiversity could be substantially improved by considering not just future changes in the distribution of individual species, but including the potential for unprecedented changes in community composition and unanticipated consequences of novel species assemblages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 5%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 300 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 118 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 23%
Student > Master 31 9%
Other 20 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 26 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 171 51%
Environmental Science 103 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 <1%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 32 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,995,107
of 24,289,456 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#24,920
of 209,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,168
of 95,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#80
of 532 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,289,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 532 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.