↓ Skip to main content

Hand cleaning with ash for reducing the spread of viral and bacterial infections: a rapid review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
109 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Hand cleaning with ash for reducing the spread of viral and bacterial infections: a rapid review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asger Sand Paludan-Müller, Kim Boesen, Irma Klerings, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Klaus Munkholm

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2020.
All research outputs
#297,643
of 15,834,614 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#677
of 11,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,410
of 280,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,834,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.