↓ Skip to main content

A Scalable Algorithm to Explore the Gibbs Energy Landscape of Genome-Scale Metabolic Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Scalable Algorithm to Explore the Gibbs Energy Landscape of Genome-Scale Metabolic Networks
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002562
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele De Martino, Matteo Figliuzzi, Andrea De Martino, Enzo Marinari

Abstract

The integration of various types of genomic data into predictive models of biological networks is one of the main challenges currently faced by computational biology. Constraint-based models in particular play a key role in the attempt to obtain a quantitative understanding of cellular metabolism at genome scale. In essence, their goal is to frame the metabolic capabilities of an organism based on minimal assumptions that describe the steady states of the underlying reaction network via suitable stoichiometric constraints, specifically mass balance and energy balance (i.e. thermodynamic feasibility). The implementation of these requirements to generate viable configurations of reaction fluxes and/or to test given flux profiles for thermodynamic feasibility can however prove to be computationally intensive. We propose here a fast and scalable stoichiometry-based method to explore the Gibbs energy landscape of a biochemical network at steady state. The method is applied to the problem of reconstructing the Gibbs energy landscape underlying metabolic activity in the human red blood cell, and to that of identifying and removing thermodynamically infeasible reaction cycles in the Escherichia coli metabolic network (iAF1260). In the former case, we produce consistent predictions for chemical potentials (or log-concentrations) of intracellular metabolites; in the latter, we identify a restricted set of loops (23 in total) in the periplasmic and cytoplasmic core as the origin of thermodynamic infeasibility in a large sample (10(6)) of flux configurations generated randomly and compatibly with the prior information available on reaction reversibility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 7%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 98 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 25%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 16%
Physics and Astronomy 11 10%
Engineering 7 6%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 17 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2012.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,955
of 8,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,964
of 177,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#96
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.