↓ Skip to main content

PhylomeDB: a database for genome-wide collections of gene phylogenies

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PhylomeDB: a database for genome-wide collections of gene phylogenies
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, December 2007
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkm899
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Anibal Bueno, Joaquín Dopazo, Toni Gabaldón

Abstract

The complete collection of evolutionary histories of all genes in a genome, also known as phylome, constitutes a valuable source of information. The reconstruction of phylomes has been previously prevented by large demands of time and computer power, but is now feasible thanks to recent developments in computers and algorithms. To provide a publicly available repository of complete phylomes that allows researchers to access and store large-scale phylogenomic analyses, we have developed PhylomeDB. PhylomeDB is a database of complete phylomes derived for different genomes within a specific taxonomic range. All phylomes in the database are built using a high-quality phylogenetic pipeline that includes evolutionary model testing and alignment trimming phases. For each genome, PhylomeDB provides the alignments, phylogentic trees and tree-based orthology predictions for every single encoded protein. The current version of PhylomeDB includes the phylomes of Human, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the bacterium Escherichia coli, comprising a total of 32 289 seed sequences with their corresponding alignments and 172 324 phylogenetic trees. PhylomeDB can be publicly accessed at http://phylomedb.bioinfo.cipf.es.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 4%
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 106 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 25%
Student > Master 18 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 18%
Computer Science 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 12 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2012.
All research outputs
#6,196,934
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#10,788
of 26,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,379
of 155,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#65
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.