↓ Skip to main content

Be caught napping: you're doing more than resting your eyes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions
Title
Be caught napping: you're doing more than resting your eyes
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, July 2002
DOI 10.1038/nn0702-618
Authors

Pierre Maquet, Philippe Peigneux, Steven Laureys, Carlyle Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,374,903
of 15,149,922 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#4,471
of 4,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,553
of 219,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#39
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,149,922 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.