↓ Skip to main content

Nipah virus glycoprotein: production in baculovirus and application in diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Virus Research, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nipah virus glycoprotein: production in baculovirus and application in diagnosis
Published in
Virus Research, November 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.06.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Eshaghi, W.S. Tan, T.B.M. Mohidin, K. Yusoff

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,553,911
of 14,785,098 outputs
Outputs from Virus Research
#563
of 2,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,254
of 132,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virus Research
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,785,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,180 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.