RT @sambadouro: @osito_kuma @TcHyNDrrXIxFOtw >解釋も十分可能です その程度ということです >却下されて當り前 ではないです 実際學術論文は行政文書として開示されています https://t.co/wcD1gzKdgw
@osito_kuma @TcHyNDrrXIxFOtw >解釋も十分可能です その程度ということです >却下されて當り前 ではないです 実際學術論文は行政文書として開示されています https://t.co/wcD1gzKdgw
RT @sambadouro: @celeste_ajigato @asuka_way きちんと書いておきますね。 画像1枚目:無症状感染の根拠として (1)厚労省のHP https://t.co/KvcgIOurlO (2)米CDCのHP https://t.co/wRwa…
RT @sambadouro: @celeste_ajigato @asuka_way きちんと書いておきますね。 画像1枚目:無症状感染の根拠として (1)厚労省のHP https://t.co/KvcgIOurlO (2)米CDCのHP https://t.co/wRwa…
RT @sambadouro: @celeste_ajigato @asuka_way きちんと書いておきますね。 画像1枚目:無症状感染の根拠として (1)厚労省のHP https://t.co/KvcgIOurlO (2)米CDCのHP https://t.co/wRwa…
@celeste_ajigato @asuka_way きちんと書いておきますね。 画像1枚目:無症状感染の根拠として (1)厚労省のHP https://t.co/KvcgIOurlO (2)米CDCのHP https://t.co/wRwahGmOOi (3)台湾の学術論文 https://t.co/dJn26kqyjq 手元にないだけ!などと紙の文書のように言う人がいますが、HPも行政文書だということです https://t.co/xRQzYrK1oj
@ankavn @koustin @0202_le @TV31894254 こちらが英語の論文になります。少し論点がズレましたがご参考くだされば幸いです。長文失礼致しました🙇🏻♀️ https://t.co/wI7BrvLzY2
RT @ryorekuiemu: 「無症状なら感染させる確率は極小」 「症状が出たらマスクする」 「大人の大半がマスクしてる」 ここまで絡んできたのを纏めるととっくに収束してるはずだがな。
「無症状なら感染させる確率は極小」 「症状が出たらマスクする」 「大人の大半がマスクしてる」 ここまで絡んできたのを纏めるととっくに収束してるはずだがな。
所謂「台湾論文」不顕性感染確率:0.362% https://t.co/uGPmTBwKZm この台湾論文の解釈が捻じ曲げられており、「感染者の半数が不顕性感染」などと誤解されている。 所謂「武漢論文」不顕性感染確率:0 https://t.co/QYVgHd9ssw なお、「無症状の感染者」というのは臨床的に診断できず、不正確な概念
@zztvcka @eicul @PaniHani1 Tady jedna starší studie: In a large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infection if their exposure to a COVID-19 case patient occurred 6 days or more after the case patient’s symptom onset. https://t.co/ShB
@DanielGriffinMD "In a large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infection if their exposure to a COVID-19 case patient occurred 6 days or more after the case patient’s symptom onset." https://t.co/95DSjGtaIf https://t.co/x6N5AjmbIE
@CollignonPeter Thank you! There’s clearly a large sample size out there. Only study I’m aware of is the Taiwan contact tracing study done Jan-March ‘20, which didn’t identify any secondary cases >5 days of symptom onset. Outdated though, of course.
В доказательство того, что “специалисты Минздрава” (это словосочетание - оксюморон, конечно, у меня рука не поднимается писать его без кавычек) правы, они представили мне ссылку на следующую статью: https://t.co/Kq1uwb4TWO
@BrahbrahL HI @brahbrahl, 3 papers here- thanks: Rapid antigen is not culture: = culture positive/ "infectious" only 53.70% of the time in this study. https://t.co/JU6elh7LIw After vax, virus less infectious https://t.co/KIxhaPPsrc. Transmission in 1st 5 d
@amberxmayy @a_veryplumplum @1219Trump @NPWDBACKUP1 @MrGoodMemes @Dana78743884 “None of the 9 asymptomatic case patients transmitted a secondary case.” Source: https://t.co/hTD1nlxkU6
マスクでウイルスは防げないうえ、陽性判定が出た人のほとんどがマスクを着けていたのに? 街中や保健所経由のPCR検査を受けた人は9割以上マスク着用者。 さあどう説明しますか。
貴方だけしてなさい。 必要だと思うならば。 それで良いでしょう?
@JWesleyE3 3 reasons would go with guidance: Rapid Ag+ = "infectious" only 53.70% of the time in this study. https://t.co/JU6elh7LIw After vax, virus is "hobbled", less infectious, even when test + https://t.co/3rsJsro85b Contact tracing- transmission, 1s
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Thanks @JenniferNuzzo - yes, as you know, a line on a lateral flow assay or a positive PCR test does not tell you if per…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Thanks @JenniferNuzzo - yes, as you know, a line on a lateral flow assay or a positive PCR test does not tell you if per…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Thanks @JenniferNuzzo - yes, as you know, a line on a lateral flow assay or a positive PCR test does not tell you if per…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Thanks @JenniferNuzzo - yes, as you know, a line on a lateral flow assay or a positive PCR test does not tell you if per…
Thanks @JenniferNuzzo - yes, as you know, a line on a lateral flow assay or a positive PCR test does not tell you if person infectious which is why @CDCDirector explained her isolation recs based on good contact tracing studies & culture studies after
@MITIMYR Here's a few that show 0 asymptomatic transmission including the largest sample size study done related to the topic. https://t.co/Glhd8PYkgh https://t.co/TOL9tu6rBq https://t.co/OIyt2j5lx5
RT @MonicaGandhi9: CDC likely to cut out asymptomatic testing at some point when we transition to endemic phase & reduced isolation to 5 da…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: CDC likely to cut out asymptomatic testing at some point when we transition to endemic phase & reduced isolation to 5 da…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: CDC likely to cut out asymptomatic testing at some point when we transition to endemic phase & reduced isolation to 5 da…
CDC likely to cut out asymptomatic testing at some point when we transition to endemic phase & reduced isolation to 5 days without tests bc 1) our tests have limitations; 2) largest contact tracing study (best way)-most transmission in 1st 5 days https
@2LcpC3IIJzNwBf5 @my_fc1 【台湾論文 原文】 https://t.co/ikgJE3qFYg 【厚労省会見概要】 https://t.co/HhIYbnB9hJ 【コロナワクチン中止嘆願 中止理由】 https://t.co/oqWUlDdHvW 中止すべき理由の1つとしても台湾論文が使われています。
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
@Haz_el_eyes Yes, because infectiousness is highest around the onset of symptoms, as Walensky explained in the full (unedited) video clip 1: https://t.co/N4L34IIFtK 2: https://t.co/5fMXPUcFha 3: https://t.co/jAr1sWdJiz
Studies tracing contacts by day of sx onset generally find shorter estimates of infectiousness, closer to the 5 day window from sx onset. One example from early in the pandemic finds no transmission events from contacts occurring only after day 5: 6/10 htt
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
@Awakend_Citizen 【台湾論文 原文】 https://t.co/ikgJE3qFYg
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
@VerneAsimov @Led_Comedy @JillWineBanks @chrislhayes https://t.co/re9KLmFg8t Does it though?
@henryamerrilees @JillWineBanks @chrislhayes Did you click through? https://t.co/re9KLmFg8t
@henryamerrilees @JillWineBanks @chrislhayes CDC is basing current strategy on this. https://t.co/zW4t6pQ90w
This is really good to know.
As someone who works in media, specifically science media, I’m generally disappointed by how science is communicated to the public (I even created a series about it). So, I’m going to try and share some more good science information here when I see it.
I'm confused. This study was performed in Taiwan before April 2020 and only looks at symptomatic positive cases. How does this inform policy on omicron? How do we 'know more about transmission' from a point in time where the spread was far less contagious
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
Highly recommend following Dr. Gandhi.
RT @Alicia_Smith19: The original guidance was fine. Large scale contact tracing studies have shown that transmission in this timeframe was…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
@Engineerinca1 @MonicaGandhi9 Presumably in the first post in the thread: https://t.co/39e8Z3gVb0
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @Alicia_Smith19: The original guidance was fine. Large scale contact tracing studies have shown that transmission in this timeframe was…
RT @Alicia_Smith19: The original guidance was fine. Large scale contact tracing studies have shown that transmission in this timeframe was…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
The original guidance was fine. Large scale contact tracing studies have shown that transmission in this timeframe was extremely rare.
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
1,155人以上、接種後の死亡者が出ておりますし、無症状感染は限りなくゼロに近いわけでありますから、緊急事態宣言の発令も取りやめたらいかがでしょうか。合理性が全くとれていないと思います。 【台湾論文 原文】 https://t.co/ikgJE3qFYg 【厚労省会見概要】 https://t.co/HhIYbnB9hJ
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @BasuAshis: Listening to @MonicaGandhi9 on @bbcworldservice about the #OmicronVariant , she agrees with Dr. Fauci that hospitalizations…
Listening to @MonicaGandhi9 on @bbcworldservice about the #OmicronVariant , she agrees with Dr. Fauci that hospitalizations are down. Real key is vaccination, masking. More from Dr Gandhi. 👇
RT @drklausner: Important data to support current duration of isolation to 5 days. Most spread occurs BEFORE symptoms and BEFORE testing r…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
Taiwan is the wrong example, not because of anything wrong with the data, but personal level precautions taken by Taiwanese would be considerably much higher. Mandate or not, masks high, personal hygiene much better. This skews any comparison to draw for
Important data to support current duration of isolation to 5 days. Most spread occurs BEFORE symptoms and BEFORE testing resulting in relatively brief period of spread after testing + or after symptoms develop. While 5 days may not prevent 100% forward s
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…
RT @MonicaGandhi9: Why 5 days? In this large contact tracing study, no contacts developed SARS-CoV-2 infections if their exposure to a case…