You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating the incidence of abortion: using the Abortion Incidence Complications Methodology in Ghana, 2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Global Health Journal, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002130 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chelsea B Polis, Philicia W Castillo, Easmon Otupiri, Sarah C Keogh, Rubina Hussain, Emmanuel K. Nakua, Roderick Larsen-Reindorf, Suzanne O Bell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Ghana | 2 | 18% |
| Guinea | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,774,169
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Global Health Journal
#2,108
of 3,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,232
of 402,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Global Health Journal
#81
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.