You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comprehensive Evaluation and Optimization of Amplicon Library Preparation Methods for High-Throughput Antibody Sequencing
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0096727 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ulrike Menzel, Victor Greiff, Tarik A. Khan, Ulrike Haessler, Ina Hellmann, Simon Friedensohn, Skylar C. Cook, Mark Pogson, Sai T. Reddy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 138 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 48 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
Other | 10 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
Other | 19 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 37% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 28% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,601,935
of 24,413,320 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#47,228
of 210,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,166
of 232,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#981
of 4,717 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,413,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,717 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.