↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive Evaluation and Optimization of Amplicon Library Preparation Methods for High-Throughput Antibody Sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive Evaluation and Optimization of Amplicon Library Preparation Methods for High-Throughput Antibody Sequencing
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0096727
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulrike Menzel, Victor Greiff, Tarik A. Khan, Ulrike Haessler, Ina Hellmann, Simon Friedensohn, Skylar C. Cook, Mark Pogson, Sai T. Reddy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 138 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 21 15%
Other 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 28%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 12 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,601,935
of 24,413,320 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#47,228
of 210,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,166
of 232,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#981
of 4,717 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,413,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,717 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.