↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological characterization of rat paw edema induced by Naja haje arabica venom

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacological characterization of rat paw edema induced by Naja haje arabica venom
Published in
Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, March 2005
DOI 10.1590/s1678-91992005000100007
Authors

A. K. Al-Asmari

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Arab Emirates 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,608,312
of 14,876,982 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
#78
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,461
of 131,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,876,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them