You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Defining New Risk Assessment Approaches Based on Perturbation of Intracellular Toxicity Pathways
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0020887 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sudin Bhattacharya, Qiang Zhang, Paul L. Carmichael, Kim Boekelheide, Melvin E. Andersen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 175 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,734,949
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#64,970
of 195,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,876
of 115,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#605
of 1,966 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,966 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.