↓ Skip to main content

Identification and Clonal Characterisation of a Progenitor Cell Sub-Population in Normal Human Articular Cartilage

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
342 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification and Clonal Characterisation of a Progenitor Cell Sub-Population in Normal Human Articular Cartilage
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013246
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Williams, Ilyas M. Khan, Kirsty Richardson, Larissa Nelson, Helen E. McCarthy, Talal Analbelsi, Sim K. Singhrao, Gary P. Dowthwaite, Rhiannon E. Jones, Duncan M. Baird, Holly Lewis, Selwyn Roberts, Hannah M. Shaw, Jayesh Dudhia, John Fairclough, Timothy Briggs, Charles W. Archer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 254 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 26%
Researcher 44 17%
Student > Master 26 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Other 12 5%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 43 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 17%
Engineering 24 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 58 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,054,522
of 23,989,432 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#74,431
of 205,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,670
of 101,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#346
of 881 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 881 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.