↓ Skip to main content

An efficient and reproducible method for transformation of genetically recalcitrant bifidobacteria

Overview of attention for article published in FEMS Microbiology Letters, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An efficient and reproducible method for transformation of genetically recalcitrant bifidobacteria
Published in
FEMS Microbiology Letters, June 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02605.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fausta Serafini, Francesca Turroni, Simone Guglielmetti, Laura Gioiosa, Elena Foroni, Valentina Sanghez, Alessandro Bartolomucci, Mary O'Connell Motherway, Paola Palanza, Douwe Sinderen, Marco Ventura

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
France 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 48 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Researcher 11 21%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,517,130
of 25,391,066 outputs
Outputs from FEMS Microbiology Letters
#1,761
of 5,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,258
of 175,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FEMS Microbiology Letters
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,706 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.