The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Deoiling and Regeneration Efficiencies of Spent Bleaching Clay
|
---|---|
Published in |
American Journal of Applied Sciences, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.3844/ajassp.2010.434.437 |
Authors |
Nursulihatimarsyila |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 21% |
Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Researcher | 3 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 11 | 23% |
Chemical Engineering | 9 | 19% |
Chemistry | 6 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Applied Sciences
#28
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,534
of 102,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Applied Sciences
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.