↓ Skip to main content

Enteral tube feeding for older people with advanced dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
407 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
606 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enteral tube feeding for older people with advanced dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007209.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth L Sampson, Bridget Candy, Louise Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 606 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 586 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 87 14%
Student > Bachelor 82 14%
Researcher 68 11%
Other 49 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 7%
Other 141 23%
Unknown 139 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 235 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 88 15%
Social Sciences 27 4%
Psychology 22 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 3%
Other 52 9%
Unknown 162 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#830,154
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,584
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,922
of 110,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.