You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of the DDS-1 strain of lactobacillus on symptomatic relief for lactose intolerance - a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-016-0172-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael N. Pakdaman, Jay K. Udani, Jhanna Pamela Molina, Michael Shahani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Philippines | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 208 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 18% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 71 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 75 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,545,643
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#402
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,029
of 351,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.