↓ Skip to main content

Revealing a 5,000-y-old beer recipe in China

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 82,435)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
244 news outlets
blogs
22 blogs
twitter
175 tweeters
facebook
16 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Revealing a 5,000-y-old beer recipe in China
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1601465113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiajing Wang, Li Liu, Terry Ball, Linjie Yu, Yuanqing Li, Fulai Xing

Abstract

The pottery vessels from the Mijiaya site reveal, to our knowledge, the first direct evidence of in situ beer making in China, based on the analyses of starch, phytolith, and chemical residues. Our data reveal a surprising beer recipe in which broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum), barley (Hordeum vulgare), Job's tears (Coix lacryma-jobi), and tubers were fermented together. The results indicate that people in China established advanced beer-brewing technology by using specialized tools and creating favorable fermentation conditions around 5,000 y ago. Our findings imply that early beer making may have motivated the initial translocation of barley from the Western Eurasia into the Central Plain of China before the crop became a part of agricultural subsistence in the region 3,000 y later.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 106 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 26%
Student > Master 23 20%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 13%
Arts and Humanities 14 12%
Chemistry 13 12%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 18 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2239. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#715
of 14,381,798 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#38
of 82,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29
of 265,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4
of 894 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,381,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 894 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.