You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A systematic review of the effects of residency training on patient outcomes
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-10-65 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Renée M van der Leeuw, Kiki MJMH Lombarts, Onyebuchi A Arah, Maas Jan Heineman |
Abstract |
Residents are vital to the clinical workforce of today and tomorrow. Although in training to become specialists, they also provide much of the daily patient care. Residency training aims to prepare residents to provide a high quality of care. It is essential to assess the patient outcome aspects of residency training, to evaluate the effect or impact of global investments made in training programs. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effects of relevant aspects of residency training on patient outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
United States | 2 | 15% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Ireland | 1 | 8% |
Belgium | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 46% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 204 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 13% |
Other | 26 | 12% |
Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 7% |
Other | 48 | 23% |
Unknown | 47 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 47% |
Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
Psychology | 10 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
Other | 23 | 11% |
Unknown | 51 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#980,239
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#688
of 4,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,981
of 178,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.