You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the Temporal Organization of Walking Variability: A Systematic Review and Consensus Guidelines on Detrended Fluctuation Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2020.00562 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deepak K. Ravi, Vivien Marmelat, William R. Taylor, Karl M. Newell, Nick Stergiou, Navrag B. Singh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 5 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Brazil | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Greece | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 61% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,290,665
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,259
of 15,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,427
of 436,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#54
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.