↓ Skip to main content

A Model-Based Bayesian Estimation of the Rate of Evolution of VNTR Loci in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Model-Based Bayesian Estimation of the Rate of Evolution of VNTR Loci in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002573
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Zachariah Aandahl, Josephine F. Reyes, Scott A. Sisson, Mark M. Tanaka

Abstract

Variable numbers of tandem repeats (VNTR) typing is widely used for studying the bacterial cause of tuberculosis. Knowledge of the rate of mutation of VNTR loci facilitates the study of the evolution and epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Previous studies have applied population genetic models to estimate the mutation rate, leading to estimates varying widely from around 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻² per locus per year. Resolving this issue using more detailed models and statistical methods would lead to improved inference in the molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis. Here, we use a model-based approach that incorporates two alternative forms of a stepwise mutation process for VNTR evolution within an epidemiological model of disease transmission. Using this model in a Bayesian framework we estimate the mutation rate of VNTR in M. tuberculosis from four published data sets of VNTR profiles from Albania, Iran, Morocco and Venezuela. In the first variant, the mutation rate increases linearly with respect to repeat numbers (linear model); in the second, the mutation rate is constant across repeat numbers (constant model). We find that under the constant model, the mean mutation rate per locus is 10⁻²·⁰⁶ (95% CI: 10⁻²·⁶¹,10⁻¹·⁵⁸)and under the linear model, the mean mutation rate per locus per repeat unit is 10⁻²·⁴⁵ (95% CI: 10⁻³·⁰⁷,10⁻¹·⁹⁴). These new estimates represent a high rate of mutation at VNTR loci compared to previous estimates. To compare the two models we use posterior predictive checks to ascertain which of the two models is better able to reproduce the observed data. From this procedure we find that the linear model performs better than the constant model. The general framework we use allows the possibility of extending the analysis to more complex models in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 65 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Computer Science 4 6%
Mathematics 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2012.
All research outputs
#17,433,619
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,517
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,183
of 177,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#91
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.