You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bone graft substitutes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-008-0878-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony M. T. Chau, Ralph J. Mobbs |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 111 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 52% |
| Engineering | 9 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2014.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,152
of 5,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,968
of 187,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.