You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Report of the Curriculum Task Force of the ISCB Education Committee
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002570 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lonnie R. Welch, Russell Schwartz, Fran Lewitter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 60% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2014.
All research outputs
#5,538,782
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,166
of 9,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,307
of 178,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#48
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.