↓ Skip to main content

Short Term Synaptic Depression Imposes a Frequency Dependent Filter on Synaptic Information Transfer

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Short Term Synaptic Depression Imposes a Frequency Dependent Filter on Synaptic Information Transfer
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002557
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Rosenbaum, Jonathan Rubin, Brent Doiron

Abstract

Depletion of synaptic neurotransmitter vesicles induces a form of short term depression in synapses throughout the nervous system. This plasticity affects how synapses filter presynaptic spike trains. The filtering properties of short term depression are often studied using a deterministic synapse model that predicts the mean synaptic response to a presynaptic spike train, but ignores variability introduced by the probabilistic nature of vesicle release and stochasticity in synaptic recovery time. We show that this additional variability has important consequences for the synaptic filtering of presynaptic information. In particular, a synapse model with stochastic vesicle dynamics suppresses information encoded at lower frequencies more than information encoded at higher frequencies, while a model that ignores this stochasticity transfers information encoded at any frequency equally well. This distinction between the two models persists even when large numbers of synaptic contacts are considered. Our study provides strong evidence that the stochastic nature neurotransmitter vesicle dynamics must be considered when analyzing the information flow across a synapse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 116 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 27%
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Master 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 32 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 25%
Mathematics 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Physics and Astronomy 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 22 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,036,604
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,324
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,440
of 177,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#55
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.