↓ Skip to main content

Combining genetic and demographic monitoring better informs conservation of an endangered urban snake

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combining genetic and demographic monitoring better informs conservation of an endangered urban snake
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0231744
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dustin A. Wood, Jonathan P. Rose, Brian J. Halstead, Ricka E. Stoelting, Karen E. Swaim, Amy G. Vandergast

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2020.
All research outputs
#9,987,541
of 17,697,618 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,554
of 166,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,127
of 285,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#101
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,697,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.