↓ Skip to main content

Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
71 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007471.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie J Woodley, Peter Lawrenson, Rhianon Boyle, June D Cody, Siv Mørkved, Ashleigh Kernohan, E Jean C Hay-Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#364,227
of 15,433,481 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#870
of 11,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,743
of 277,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,433,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.