↓ Skip to main content

Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
100 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
835 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007471.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie J Woodley, Peter Lawrenson, Rhianon Boyle, June D Cody, Siv Mørkved, Ashleigh Kernohan, E Jean C Hay-Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 835 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 832 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 109 13%
Student > Master 86 10%
Unspecified 52 6%
Researcher 51 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 6%
Other 152 18%
Unknown 336 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 160 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 158 19%
Unspecified 52 6%
Sports and Recreations 24 3%
Social Sciences 16 2%
Other 73 9%
Unknown 352 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#339,126
of 23,706,059 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#621
of 12,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,843
of 384,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,706,059 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.