↓ Skip to main content

Mendelian randomization analysis does not support causal associations of birth weight with hypertension risk and blood pressure in adulthood

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
14 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mendelian randomization analysis does not support causal associations of birth weight with hypertension risk and blood pressure in adulthood
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, May 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10654-020-00638-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Zheng, Tao Huang, Tiange Wang, Zhendong Mei, Zhonghan Sun, Tao Zhang, Christina Ellervik, Jin-Fang Chai, Xueling Sim, Rob M. van Dam, E-Shyong Tai, Woon-Puay Koh, Rajkumar Dorajoo, Seang-Mei Saw, Charumathi Sabanayagam, Tien Yin Wong, Preeti Gupta, Peter Rossing, Tarunveer S. Ahluwalia, Rebecca K. Vinding, Hans Bisgaard, Klaus Bønnelykke, Yujie Wang, Mariaelisa Graff, Trudy Voortman, Frank J. A. van Rooij, Albert Hofman, Diana van Heemst, Raymond Noordam, Angela C. Estampador, Tibor V. Varga, Cornelia Enzenbach, Markus Scholz, Joachim Thiery, Ralph Burkhardt, Marju Orho-Melander, Christina-Alexandra Schulz, Ulrika Ericson, Emily Sonestedt, Michiaki Kubo, Masato Akiyama, Ang Zhou, Tuomas O. Kilpeläinen, Torben Hansen, Marcus E. Kleber, Graciela Delgado, Mark McCarthy, Rozenn N. Lemaitre, Janine F. Felix, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe, Ying Wu, Karen L. Mohlke, Terho Lehtimäki, Carol A. Wang, Craig E. Pennell, Heribert Schunkert, Thorsten Kessler, Lingyao Zeng, Christina Willenborg, Annette Peters, Wolfgang Lieb, Veit Grote, Peter Rzehak, Berthold Koletzko, Jeanette Erdmann, Matthias Munz, Tangchun Wu, Meian He, Caizheng Yu, Cécile Lecoeur, Philippe Froguel, Dolores Corella, Luis A. Moreno, Chao-Qiang Lai, Niina Pitkänen, Colin A. Boreham, Paul M. Ridker, Frits R. Rosendaal, Renée de Mutsert, Chris Power, Lavinia Paternoster, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Anne Tjønneland, Kim Overvad, Luc Djousse, Fernando Rivadeneira, Nanette R. Lee, Olli T. Raitakari, Mika Kähönen, Jorma Viikari, Jean-Paul Langhendries, Joaquin Escribano, Elvira Verduci, George Dedoussis, Inke König, Beverley Balkau, Oscar Coltell, Jean Dallongeville, Aline Meirhaeghe, Philippe Amouyel, Frédéric Gottrand, Katja Pahkala, Harri Niinikoski, Elina Hyppönen, Winfried März, David A. Mackey, Dariusz Gruszfeld, Katherine L. Tucker, Frédéric Fumeron, Ramon Estruch, Jose M. Ordovas, Donna K. Arnett, Dennis O. Mook-Kanamori, Dariush Mozaffarian, Bruce M. Psaty, Kari E. North, Daniel I. Chasman, Lu Qi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 40%
Unspecified 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 40%
Unspecified 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#554,634
of 16,209,978 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#87
of 1,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,465
of 279,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,209,978 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.