You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Classroom Changes in ADHD Symptoms Following Clinic-Based Behavior Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10880-012-9307-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David F. Curtis, Stephanie Chapman, Jack Dempsey, Sarah Mire |
| Abstract |
This study examined classroom behavioral outcomes for children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) following their participation in a manualized, 10-week intervention called Family Skills Training for ADHD-Related Symptoms (Family STARS). Family STARS combined behavioral parent training (BPT) and child-focused behavioral activation therapy (CBAT). Participants were children ages 7-10 diagnosed with ADHD-Combined Type. Pre- and post-treatment teacher ratings of ADHD symptoms were compared using a single group, within-subjects research design. Intervention effectiveness was analyzed using paired-samples t-tests. Results indicated statistically significant classroom improvements for externalizing behaviors and attention problems with medium and large main effects (respectively) for the intervention. Possible implications for combining CBAT with BPT for the treatment of ADHD are discussed as well as the relevance of these results for improving the effectiveness and portability of empirically supported interventions. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 24% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 45% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2012.
All research outputs
#20,160,460
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#407
of 440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,813
of 166,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.