↓ Skip to main content

A collaborative approach for estimating terrestrial wildlife abundance

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A collaborative approach for estimating terrestrial wildlife abundance
Published in
Biological Conservation, September 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.05.006
Authors

Jason I. Ransom, Petra Kaczensky, Bruce C. Lubow, Oyunsaikhan Ganbaatar, Nanjid Altansukh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 4 4%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 95 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 23%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 54%
Environmental Science 26 25%
Computer Science 4 4%
Unspecified 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 10 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#5,230,345
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,920
of 5,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,540
of 132,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#22
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.