You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using developmental evaluation to enhance continuous reflection, learning and adaptation of an innovation platform in Australian Indigenous primary healthcare
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-020-00562-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jodie Bailie, Alison Frances Laycock, David Peiris, Roxanne Gwendalyn Bainbridge, Veronica Matthews, Frances Clare Cunningham, Kathleen Parker Conte, Seye Abimbola, Megan Elizabeth Passey, Ross Stewart Bailie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 25% |
| Rwanda | 2 | 10% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 5% |
| Senegal | 1 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,592,010
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#152
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,782
of 421,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#9
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.