↓ Skip to main content

An Improvement of Shotgun Proteomics Analysis by Adding Next-Generation Sequencing Transcriptome Data in Orange

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Improvement of Shotgun Proteomics Analysis by Adding Next-Generation Sequencing Transcriptome Data in Orange
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039494
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiaping Song, Renjie Sun, Dazhi Li, Fengji Tan, Xin Li, Pingping Jiang, Xinjie Huang, Liang Lin, Ziniu Deng, Yong Zhang

Abstract

Shotgun proteomics data analysis usually relies on database search. Because commonly employed protein sequence databases of most species do not contain sufficient protein information, the application of shotgun proteomics to the research of protein sequence profile remains a big challenge, especially to the species whose genome has not been sequenced yet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
India 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 31%
Researcher 9 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 18%
Computer Science 6 13%
Engineering 4 9%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 1 2%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2012.
All research outputs
#18,309,495
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,778
of 193,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,274
of 164,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,128
of 3,987 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,987 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.