You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing the Quality of Reports about Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture Treatment on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0038461 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chen Bo, Zhao Xue, Guo Yi, Chen Zelin, Bai Yang, Wang Zixu, Wang Yajun |
Abstract |
To evaluate the reports' qualities which are about randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture treatment on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Egypt | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
Norway | 1 | 2% |
Egypt | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 25% |
Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 60% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,660,193
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,222
of 193,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,914
of 164,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,966
of 3,959 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,959 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.