↓ Skip to main content

Temporal Variability of Human Vaginal Bacteria and Relationship with Bacterial Vaginosis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
373 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Temporal Variability of Human Vaginal Bacteria and Relationship with Bacterial Vaginosis
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010197
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sujatha Srinivasan, Congzhou Liu, Caroline M. Mitchell, Tina L. Fiedler, Katherine K. Thomas, Kathy J. Agnew, Jeanne M. Marrazzo, David N. Fredricks

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
South Africa 3 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 311 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 12%
Student > Master 37 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 74 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 35 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 95 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,304,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#101,750
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,886
of 107,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#352
of 760 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 760 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.