↓ Skip to main content

Experimental Effects of Viewing Thin and Plus-size Models in Objectifying and Empowering Contexts on Instagram

Overview of attention for article published in Health Communication, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Experimental Effects of Viewing Thin and Plus-size Models in Objectifying and Empowering Contexts on Instagram
Published in
Health Communication, May 2020
DOI 10.1080/10410236.2020.1761077
Authors

Joshua Hendrickse, Russell B. Clayton, Elizabeth C. Ray, Jessica L. Ridgway, Rachel Secharan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#11,645,171
of 15,252,059 outputs
Outputs from Health Communication
#930
of 1,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,591
of 238,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Communication
#24
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,252,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.