| Title |
Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19: a rapid review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013600 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah J Valk, Vanessa Piechotta, Khai Li Chai, Carolyn Doree, Ina Monsef, Erica M Wood, Abigail Lamikanra, Catherine Kimber, Zoe McQuilten, Cynthia So-Osman, Lise J Estcourt, Nicole Skoetz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 283 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 30 | 11% |
| Italy | 16 | 6% |
| Spain | 15 | 5% |
| Argentina | 15 | 5% |
| United States | 14 | 5% |
| Chile | 10 | 4% |
| India | 6 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 55 | 19% |
| Unknown | 111 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 233 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 11% |
| Scientists | 14 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 650 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 650 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 94 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 62 | 10% |
| Researcher | 59 | 9% |
| Other | 42 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 5% |
| Other | 121 | 19% |
| Unknown | 240 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 185 | 28% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 41 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 66 | 10% |
| Unknown | 267 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 355. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#93,016
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#165
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,476
of 422,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.