↓ Skip to main content

Avanço cirúrgico de maxila e ressonância de fala: comparação entre os tipos de fissura

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avanço cirúrgico de maxila e ressonância de fala: comparação entre os tipos de fissura
Published in
CoDAS, January 2020
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20202019152
Authors

Maria Natália Leite de Medeiros-Santana, Bruna Mara Adorno Marmontel Araújo, Ana Paula Fukushiro, Inge Elly Kiemle Trindade, Renata Paciello Yamashita

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Librarian 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,152,333
of 17,726,748 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#144
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,993
of 286,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,726,748 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them