↓ Skip to main content

Extractive investibility in historical colonial perspective: the emerging market and its antecedents in Indonesia

Overview of attention for article published in Review of International Political Economy, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 482)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
65 tweeters
Title
Extractive investibility in historical colonial perspective: the emerging market and its antecedents in Indonesia
Published in
Review of International Political Economy, May 2020
DOI 10.1080/09692290.2020.1763423
Authors

Lisa Tilley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#449,573
of 15,386,317 outputs
Outputs from Review of International Political Economy
#21
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,178
of 276,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of International Political Economy
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,386,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.