You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mild hypothermia delays the development of stone heart from untreated sustained ventricular fibrillation - a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-13-17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vincent L Sorrell, Vijayasree Paleru, Maria I Altbach, Ronald W Hilwig, Karl B Kern, Mohamed Gaballa, Gordon A Ewy, Robert A Berg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 41% |
Philosophy | 1 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#17,537,548
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,091
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,422
of 120,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.