↓ Skip to main content

Weaving geodesic foliations

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weaving geodesic foliations
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2019
DOI 10.1145/3306346.3323043
Authors

Josh Vekhter, Jiacheng Zhuo, Luisa F Gil Fandino, Qixing Huang, Etienne Vouga

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#9,706,350
of 15,252,059 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1,783
of 1,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,376
of 237,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,252,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.