↓ Skip to main content

Racism and responsibility – The critical limits of deepfake methodology in security studies: A reply to Howell and Richter-Montpetit

Overview of attention for article published in Security Dialogue, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 431)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
799 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Racism and responsibility – The critical limits of deepfake methodology in security studies: A reply to Howell and Richter-Montpetit
Published in
Security Dialogue, May 2020
DOI 10.1177/0967010620916153
Authors

Ole Wæver, Barry Buzan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 799 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 596. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,825
of 15,148,579 outputs
Outputs from Security Dialogue
#1
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#770
of 200,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Security Dialogue
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,148,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.