You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Collect the Bones, Avoid the Cones: A Game-Based App for Public Engagement
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 9 |
| Book title |
Biomedical Visualisation
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-43961-3_9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-03-043960-6, 978-3-03-043961-3
|
| Authors |
Yasmin Wong, Paul M. Rea, Brian Loranger, Ourania Varsou, Wong, Yasmin, Rea, Paul M., Loranger, Brian, Varsou, Ourania |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 37 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2020.
All research outputs
#18,732,892
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,341
of 4,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,408
of 398,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#49
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.