↓ Skip to main content

Dual Coding with STDP in a Spiking Recurrent Neural Network Model of the Hippocampus

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dual Coding with STDP in a Spiking Recurrent Neural Network Model of the Hippocampus
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000839
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Bush, Andrew Philippides, Phil Husbands, Michael O'Shea

Abstract

The firing rate of single neurons in the mammalian hippocampus has been demonstrated to encode for a range of spatial and non-spatial stimuli. It has also been demonstrated that phase of firing, with respect to the theta oscillation that dominates the hippocampal EEG during stereotype learning behaviour, correlates with an animal's spatial location. These findings have led to the hypothesis that the hippocampus operates using a dual (rate and temporal) coding system. To investigate the phenomenon of dual coding in the hippocampus, we examine a spiking recurrent network model with theta coded neural dynamics and an STDP rule that mediates rate-coded Hebbian learning when pre- and post-synaptic firing is stochastic. We demonstrate that this plasticity rule can generate both symmetric and asymmetric connections between neurons that fire at concurrent or successive theta phase, respectively, and subsequently produce both pattern completion and sequence prediction from partial cues. This unifies previously disparate auto- and hetero-associative network models of hippocampal function and provides them with a firmer basis in modern neurobiology. Furthermore, the encoding and reactivation of activity in mutually exciting Hebbian cell assemblies demonstrated here is believed to represent a fundamental mechanism of cognitive processing in the brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 5%
United States 5 5%
United Kingdom 5 5%
Brazil 2 2%
China 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 81 74%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 33%
Researcher 23 21%
Student > Master 9 8%
Professor 7 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 22%
Neuroscience 23 21%
Computer Science 23 21%
Engineering 11 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 13 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,296
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,771
of 103,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#27
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.