You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cost-utility analysis in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing kidney transplant; what pays? A systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12962-020-00213-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sameera Senanayake, Nicholas Graves, Helen Healy, Keshwar Baboolal, Sanjeewa Kularatna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 57% |
Singapore | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Researcher | 5 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 29 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 16% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 29 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,796,362
of 23,208,901 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#181
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,328
of 389,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,208,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.