The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of an intervention to facilitate implementation and uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-00982-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Riordan, Emmy Racine, Eunice T. Phillip, Colin Bradley, Fabiana Lorencatto, Mark Murphy, Aileen Murphy, John Browne, Susan M. Smith, Patricia M. Kearney, Sheena M. McHugh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 7 | 25% |
| Australia | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 46% |
| Scientists | 8 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 49 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,835,266
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#362
of 1,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,510
of 394,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.