↓ Skip to main content

Morphological, elemental, and boron isotopic insights into pathophysiology of diseased coral growth anomalies

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morphological, elemental, and boron isotopic insights into pathophysiology of diseased coral growth anomalies
Published in
Scientific Reports, May 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-65118-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik R. Andersson, Joseph A. Stewart, Thierry M. Work, Cheryl M. Woodley, Tracey B. Schock, Rusty D. Day

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 27%
Environmental Science 9 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,991,385
of 23,208,901 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#47,187
of 125,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,767
of 389,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,472
of 3,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,208,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.