↓ Skip to main content

Assessing Drug Target Association Using Semantic Linked Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
citeulike
13 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing Drug Target Association Using Semantic Linked Data
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002574
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bin Chen, Ying Ding, David J. Wild

Abstract

The rapidly increasing amount of public data in chemistry and biology provides new opportunities for large-scale data mining for drug discovery. Systematic integration of these heterogeneous sets and provision of algorithms to data mine the integrated sets would permit investigation of complex mechanisms of action of drugs. In this work we integrated and annotated data from public datasets relating to drugs, chemical compounds, protein targets, diseases, side effects and pathways, building a semantic linked network consisting of over 290,000 nodes and 720,000 edges. We developed a statistical model to assess the association of drug target pairs based on their relation with other linked objects. Validation experiments demonstrate the model can correctly identify known direct drug target pairs with high precision. Indirect drug target pairs (for example drugs which change gene expression level) are also identified but not as strongly as direct pairs. We further calculated the association scores for 157 drugs from 10 disease areas against 1683 human targets, and measured their similarity using a [Formula: see text] score matrix. The similarity network indicates that drugs from the same disease area tend to cluster together in ways that are not captured by structural similarity, with several potential new drug pairings being identified. This work thus provides a novel, validated alternative to existing drug target prediction algorithms. The web service is freely available at: http://chem2bio2rdf.org/slap.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
Germany 3 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 192 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 25%
Researcher 48 23%
Student > Master 23 11%
Other 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 22 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 45 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 19%
Chemistry 26 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 33 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2012.
All research outputs
#2,379,033
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,117
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,355
of 178,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#16
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.