↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying and Analyzing the Network Basis of Genetic Complexity

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying and Analyzing the Network Basis of Genetic Complexity
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002583
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ethan G. Thompson, Timothy Galitski

Abstract

Genotype-to-phenotype maps exhibit complexity. This genetic complexity is mentioned frequently in the literature, but a consistent and quantitative definition is lacking. Here, we derive such a definition and investigate its consequences for model genetic systems. The definition equates genetic complexity with a surplus of genotypic diversity over phenotypic diversity. Applying this definition to ensembles of Boolean network models, we found that the in-degree distribution and the number of periodic attractors produced determine the relative complexity of different topology classes. We found evidence that networks that are difficult to control, or that exhibit a hierarchical structure, are genetically complex. We analyzed the complexity of the cell cycle network of Sacchoromyces cerevisiae and pinpointed genes and interactions that are most important for its high genetic complexity. The rigorous definition of genetic complexity is a tool for unraveling the structure and properties of genotype-to-phenotype maps by enabling the quantitative comparison of the relative complexities of different genetic systems. The definition also allows the identification of specific network elements and subnetworks that have the greatest effects on genetic complexity. Moreover, it suggests ways to engineer biological systems with desired genetic properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 9%
Germany 3 5%
Portugal 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
France 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 47 72%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 31%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 14%
Computer Science 8 12%
Mathematics 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 3 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,040,614
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,646
of 9,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,983
of 178,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#24
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.